This thread is a continuation of the enabling transfers discussion. We moved this discussion in to the governance category, please see the previous thread here.
From @patogit
I was not part of the decision to launch without transfers, and I think it’s a wise decision. I think one of the reasons that Regen Network is taking a slower path than some other blockchains is to ma
I encourage us consider moving on enabling transfers sooner than later. I think it is wise to wait until there is a higher staking ratio, but my hope is that we cross the 50% threshold perhaps this week and at that point, considering the fact that Regen Foundation is holding a huge portion of the unstaked tokens it appears to me that the chain would be at very little risk.
I know there are a handful of token holders who are stuck without any tokens left to claim their rewards and a whole stack of interested REGEN token purchasers waiting for our public sale, which obviously can only happen after transfers are enabled.
My sense is that if we vote to enable, we’ll be in a good spot by the time it’s enabled.
In favor of enabling transfers and IBC. Since both are just param changes, I believe they can be two separate param change proposals. It makes sense to enable transfers first though.
With Gravity DEX launching soon, the timing is right to get some liquidity flowing.
