Hey everyone!
Great discussion going on here. I think that Regen Network is becoming important for the establishment of methodologies, as many projects have been arriving to present their views, providing debates and generating innovation in the community. I think the role for Regen as a community that rates, discusses and legitimizes methodologies for projects everywhere is very important. In the case of Ekonavi qualitative methodology, we think that is very productive to interact with others to establish a common ground.
I think it is normal that some uncertainty plays a role, when we are working with human life and environment, where not all variables can be mathematically measured. So, it is important to keep track of developments to achieve consensus, but taking in consideration that there will always be something to be criticized. If there is track of development, than this shows that rational choices were taken along the way.